28.4.16

Malware found at a German nuclear power plant



Malware has been found on a computer at Gundremmingen nuclear power plant in Germany, it has been revealed. Reuters reported that RWE, the electric utilities company responsible for operating the plant, does not consider it a threat as the infected computer is not connected to the internet.
The malware includes Conficker, which has been described as the most virulent malware of the 2000s. At its peak, in 2009, it is thought to have infected over 15 million computers around the world. According to the news provider, malware was found on a computer that “was retrofitted in 2008 with data visualization software associated with equipment for moving nuclear fuel rods”.
However, this was not a sole incident, as malware was also discovered on 18 removable disk drives.David Harley, a senior research fellow at ESET, said that given the number of infected removable drives also found at the nuclear plant, “internet disconnection doesn’t in itself guarantee that a system can’t be infected, can’t be the cause of further infections on the site, or that a dangerous payload can’t be executed”. “It’s possible in some circumstances for malware usually considered harmless to be literally dangerous if it finds its way onto a critical system,” the expert concluded.
In an official press release, RWE said that the malware was found during “preparatory testing work”. Research from earlier this year has suggested that countries around the world are underprepared when it comes to cyberattacks.
The third edition of the Nuclear Threat Initiative’s (NIT) Nuclear Security Index revealed that approximately half the countries assessed do not have a single requirement in place to protect their nuclear facilities from this threat. “Like all critical infrastructure, nuclear facilities are not immune to cyberattacks,” the paper highlighted in January. “That reality is particularly worrisome, however, given the potentially catastrophic consequences of a cyberattack on a nuclear facility.”

27.4.16

BeautifulPeople.com experiences data breach: 1m affected



The personal data of around 1.1 million people could be sold off on the black market after it was revealed that the dating website BeautifulPeople.com had experienced a data breach. The company describes its service as “online dating for beautiful people only”, as aspiring members must first win approval from the app’s accepted users before being paired up with like-minded individuals.
The leaked private information could include member’s names, addresses, sexual preference, relationship status, phone numbers, email addresses and even private messages. The sensitive nature of the attack is reminiscent of last year’s disastrous Ashley Madison breach, although on a smaller scale than the 37 million users who were affected last summer.
According to a report by Wired, the flaw was first discovered last December when security researcher Chris Vickery found the information via the database management software MongoDB. Although Mr. Vickery informed Beautiful People that its database was exposed, the information was apparently taken from the database by one or more unknown parties before the company had a chance to make it private.
Beautiful People has described the database containing the information as a “test server”, although it will make little difference to the victims which could include anyone who signed up to the site before mid-July 2015.
Mr. Vickery told Forbes, which originally reported this story, that the database he’d obtained contained over 15 million messages between users. The company has said that all victims were notified of the incident in December, and will be contacted again in light of this latest development.

This incident serves as another reminder to be extra careful when handing over sensitive details. Good looks may get you a long way in life, but they won’t help protect you against cybercriminals. 

Ransomware and the Internet of Things



We all know that ransomware has become a huge problem, hitting businesses and consumers alike as it encrypts valuable data and attempting to extort sometimes large sums of money for safe recovery.
But at least we can console ourselves with one thought: the threat has been confined to encrypting data on computers and web servers, or locking users out of their systems until a ransom has been paid.
But the rise of the Internet of Things (IoT) means that the nature of what we consider to be a computer is constantly widening, and these other devices could be target for ransomware in the future warns a report from the Institute for Critical Infrastructure Technology (ICIT).
The report, rather alarmingly entitled “Combatting the ransomware blitzkreig”, discusses various families of crypto-ransomware and underlines the importance of computer users to be prepared for such attacks with a layered defense.
But the particular part of the report that caught my eye was the section where it described potential future threats:
IoT devices offer a potential growth bed to any ransomware operation because the devices are interconnected by design and many pointedly lack any form of security. A selection of traditional malware will be too large to ever run on a number of IoT devices, but ransomware, predominantly consisting of a few commands and an encryption algorithm, is much lighter.
How much do you predict someone would pay to remove ransomware from a pacemaker? The scenario is not too far-fetched; in fact, it is much more deadly. Many medical devices, such as pacemakers, insulin pumps, and other medication dispersion systems are internet or Bluetooth enabled. Ransomware could utilize that open connection to infect the IoT device.
I feel that the issue the ICIT is raising in this report is not too far fetched.
We know from past experience that many cybercriminals have no qualms about putting lives in danger, and that many IoT devices suffer from weak security compared to regular computers, suffer from hard-coded passwords, may have no simple updating infrastructure, and can be riddled with a wide variety of vulnerabilities.
We have even seen devices such as CCTV cameras and routers, that you wouldn’t naturally consider the typical botnet recruits, being exploited to launch DDoS attacks.
So, what’s so different about such internet-enabled devices being meddled with in ransomware-style attacks, where the hackers demand a Bitcoin payment be made for the device’s return to normal operation? Why couldn’t ransomware target medical devices, for instance?
In 2010, a hacker remotely disabled over 100 cars in Austin Texas by hacking into an online vehicle immobilization service. How easy would it have been to have combined
If criminals believe there is easy money to be made, surely some will be tempted to explore ransomware attacks against IoT devices in future. The report goes on to quote Jon Miller from Cylance, that another form of attack against IoT devices could see attempts to reduce their battery life:
“…even light encryption on a pacemaker could decrease its battery life from about a decade to as little as a few years or even a few months because the device is not designed to sustain those operations. The more resource intensive the encryption, the more dire the situation.” Of course, anyone launching an IoT ransomware attack will need to consider just *how* they will inform the device’s owner of their financial demands. That’s obvious on a laptop, but presents more of a challenge on a pacemaker unless the attacker has also managed to determine, say, their victim’s email address.
Whether ransomware attacks against IoT devices are going to be as regular a part of our future as attacks on traditional computer systems are today, remains to be seen.
But it surely is another reason for us to be even more concerned that security is treated as a priority by all companies manufacturing internet-enabled devices.

24.4.16

SMS phishing attackers continue to pursue Apple users



A week ago I reported on my personal blog how criminals were spamming out SMS messages that claimed to come from Apple, but were actually designed to steal personal information for the purposes of identity theft.
The messages all used a cunning piece of social engineering – posing as a notice from Apple that their Apple ID was due to expire that very day – to get unsuspecting users to click on a link to a phishing website.
The SMS messages were even more convincing because they referred to recipients by name, most likely fooling some into believing that there was a genuine reason to act upon the alert and visit the site pointed to by the criminals.
Although the site the criminals were initially using – appleexpired.co.uk – was quickly blocked by the major web browsers and taken down, that didn’t take the wind out of the criminals’s sails.
In the days since it has become clear that the identity thieves have registered a series of other domains – all claiming to be related to Apple or Apple ID.
Examples have included icloudauth.co.uk, mobileicloud.uk, and icloudmobile.co.uk.
And today I received a message from a reader who has been sent a new version of the scam, pointing to a phishing site that – at the time of writing – remains online.
Read the complete article on:

22.4.16

Two-factor authentication coming to PlayStation Network


By Narinder Purba posted 22 Apr 2016 
Two-factor authentication (2FA) is to be added to the PlayStation Network, offering members even greater security.
News of this was first made public on Twitter on April 19th, when one of its users posted a tweet.
Sharing an image, he stated: “More proof about #PSN 2-step verification. This is from PS3 after today’s v4.80 update.”
The image was a screenshot, which read: “The sign-in ID or password is not correct. If 2-step verification is active, you must enter a device setup password into the [Password] field.
“Check your mobile phone for a text message about your Sony Entertainment Network account.”
2FA is often described as being an additional security process, which requires individuals to provide a supplementary piece of information when trying to access a device or account.
It usually comes in the form of a code, meaning that if you are signing into your email account on a new device for the first time, along with your username and password, you will have to input a uniquely generated code (usually sent to your smartphone).
Although Sony has yet to release an official statement, a representative told GameSpot that 2FA is going to be a permanent feature.
This is welcome news, further bolstering the security on the network, which was attacked two years ago.
A distributed denial of service attack resulted in the network being taken offline. Sony commented at the time that no data had been accessed.
“Like other major networks around the world, the PlayStation Network and Sony Entertainment Network have been impacted by an attempt to overwhelm our network with artificially high traffic,” it stated.

“Although this has impacted your ability to access our network and enjoy our services, no personal information has been accessed.”


Encrypt – or face a huge fine



The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO), the UK’s independent authority that oversees data privacy, recently released a new guidance on encryption best practices. Although encryption of data is not mandatory under UK data protection legislation, the ICO strongly recommends that organizations dealing with personal data use it.
“In recent years there have been numerous incidents where personal data has been stolen, lost or subject to unauthorized access,” the ICO states.
“In many of these cases, these were caused by data being inadequately protected or the devices the data was stored on being left in inappropriate places – and in some cases both. The Information Commissioner has formed the view that in future, where such losses occur and where encryption software has not been used to protect data, regulatory action may be pursued.”
The guidance highlights a number of cases where organizations were fined for not complying with this obligation. Personal data from over 1,000 people with links to serious organized crime investigations, information and evidence concerning vulnerable children, as well as sensitive information on hundreds of children with special educational needs, are among the cases of lost removable media with unencrypted data.
Additionally, it drew attention to a case involving a financial services company, which was unable to locate the whereabouts of two backup disks that contained more than half a million customer details; as well as a case relating to a local authority in Scotland, which misplace two laptops that had personal information of over 20,000 people stored on it. In both instances, the data was not encrypted.
The UK’s Data Protection Act of 1998, which stems from The Data Protection Directive and is thus closely similar to privacy laws across the European Union, states in its Principle 7:
“Appropriate technical and organizational measures shall be taken against unauthorized or unlawful processing of personal data and against accidental loss or destruction of, or damage to, personal data.”
The ICO recommends that organizations carry out a Privacy Impact Assessment to identify and reduce privacy risks of their projects. However, encryption should be always considered – of course, alongside a range of other technical and organizational security measures.

20.4.16

Cyberattacks on buildings more common than you think



In an increasingly connected world, the threat posed by cybercriminals will extend further than ever before – the Internet of Things (IoT) is shaking things up. It’s no longer about computers or smartphones being at risk – any object, any ‘thing’ that is powered by a computer and/or connected to the internet, is a target. This can be seen in modern cars. Less than a generation ago, it was have been unthinkable that these modes of transport could be hacked.
However, as WeLiveSecurity has reported, this is very real – cars, along with other ‘non-computer’ things, such as toys, are vulnerable to cyberattacks.
The discussion – and the threat – is widening it seems, with a recent BBC News feature highlighting the fact that buildings are increasingly susceptible to cybercrime.
In the report, it is estimated that the number of connected buildings, including hospitals, research facilities and even churches – in the world number around 50,000. Worryingly, 2,000 of these are thought to have no password protection in place.
Even organizations like Google, known for being proactive in boosting the security of the web, are not immune to this threat, as an incident revealed in 2013.
Two white-hat security researchers from the US managed to hack into the building management system of an office belonging to the tech giant in Sydney, Australia.
While this was just a test, actual cyberattacks to buildings are “happening all the time”, explained Martyn Thomas, a professor of IT at Gresham College in the UK, in the BBC’s report.
Andrew Kelly, principal security consultant at defence company Qinetiq, shares this assessment, stating that specific types of cyberattacks – especially ransomware – are “on the horizon”.
And Mr. Kelly is concerned about the state of play today. His research into smart buildings, for example, was a revelation, with building management systems found to be most at risk. “In all cases, pretty much without fail, these systems had been procured without thought to how to make them secure. I was absolutely shocked,” he told the broadcaster. “We saw systems installed with default passwords where it would be a trivial exercise for someone remotely to gain access.”
http://www.welivesecurity.com/2016/04/20/buildings-risk-cyberattacks/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+eset%2Fblog+%28ESET+Blog%3A+We+Live+Security%29