23.2.17

Un rapport récent prouve qu’ESET protège le consommateur à 100% contre les faux positifs


ESET a obtenu deux médailles d’or et la distinction ‘Top Rated Product’ dans le rapport 2016 d’AV-Comparatives
ESET a obtenu sa troisième distinction ‘Top Rated Product’ d’Av-Comparatives. En tête dans les catégories ‘Faux Positifs’ et ‘Performances’, ESET a été récompensé par des médailles d’or pour ses résultats. Les solutions ESET offrent aux consommateurs un haut niveau de performance couplé à une faible empreinte système et à des capacités de détection supérieures. Ces solutions permettent donc aux usagers de surfer sur Internet en toute sérénité.
Le rapport annuel d’AV-Comparatives, intitulé ‘Summary Report 2016’, évalue les résultats des tests de l’an dernier et récompense les meilleures solutions du marché. Le rapport donne  également une vue d’ensemble des produits sélectionnés, y compris ESET Internet Security le nouveau produit de la gamme ESET HOME Edition.
ESET, présent depuis plus de dix ans dans nos rapports annuels, est en tête dans nos tests avec un très faible impact sur les performance de l’appareil, zéro faux positifs tout en assurant une détection en continu,” explique Andreas Clementi, CEO d’AV-Comparatives.
Comme mentionné dans le rapport, “les faux positifs peuvent créer autant de problèmes que les vraies infections. Pour cette raison, il est important que les antivirus subissent des tests rigoureux de qualité avant d’être proposés au public, afin  d’éviter les faux positifs, ” ajoute Andreas Clementi.
Au cours des trois dernières années, le secteur de la cybersécurité a redoublé d'efforts pour détecter et neutraliser les menaces. Aujourd’hui, malgré des normes de qualité toujours plus poussées en termes de taux de détection de malware, nous pouvons toujours offrir à nos utilisateurs des produits fiables à impact très faible, qui demandent peu d’attention et une maintenance minimale, ” commente Juraj Malcho, CTO d’ESET.
Au  cours des douze derniers mois, ESET a été récompensé par quatre Advanced+ Awards et trois Advanced Award d’AV-Comparatives.
Pour en savoir plus au sujet d’ESET ou d’ESET Internet Security, visitez notre site www.eset.com. Pour lire le rapport complet ‘Summary report 2016’ d’AV-Comparatives, clickez here.   
En savoir plus à propos d’ESET ?

Depuis 30 ans, ESET® développe des solutions de sécurité et des services d’avant-garde  pour les entreprises et les consommateurs du monde entier. Avec des solutions qui vont de la sécurité endpoint et mobile jusqu’au chiffrement et à l’authentification à deux facteurs, les produits d’ESET, très performants et faciles à utiliser, offrent la tranquillité d’esprit aux consommateurs et aux entreprises en leur permettant de bénéficier de tout le potentiel de leur technologie. ESET protège et contrôle discrètement  24/7, met à jour - en temps réel - la protection afin que les utilisateurs soient en sécurité et que les entreprises puissent travailler sans interruption.  Les menaces qui évoluent exigent un fournisseur de sécurité IT qui évolue, lui aussi. Supportée au niveau global par des centres de R & D, ESET est le premier fournisseur à obtenir plus de distinctions (100 Virus Bulletin VB100 ) en identifiant chaque malware “in-the-wild” sans interruption depuis  2003. Visitez www.eset.com pour plus d’information ou suivez-nous sur LinkedIn, Facebook et Twitter.

21.2.17

Support scams now reign in Spain


If you asked most people what they believe to be the most prevalent form of threat right now, they’d almost certain say ‘ransomware’. However, my colleague Josep Albors has come to a surprising conclusion in his Spanish language blog Fake technical support is the most detected threat in Spain during January. While the data on which he drew indicates that Spain leads the field in detections of HTML/FakeAlert, several other countries (including the UK and France) are seeing detections in surprisingly large quantities.
The following is a very free translation of Josep’s article with some commentary from me. Any errors in translation are down to me.
It’s not all about ransomware
Malicious software (malware) and ransomware in particular are among the most notorious threats at the moment, and capable of causing a great deal of harm to their victims, whether it’s financial loss or the loss of valued data. Nevertheless, there are other threats that may be less damaging – at any rate to targeted organizations, which tend to be required to pay larger ransoms than random individual victims – but are by no means harmless. Even the range of weaselly nuisances that the security industry tends to categorize as ‘Possibly Unwanted’ are sometimes intrusive enough to impact seriously on a computer/device user’s online experience. While messages, phone calls and web pages used to execute fraud such as support scams are no less criminal in intent than ransomware, though they may in most cases cause less damage.
That said, a support scammer who has succeeded in luring victims into giving him access to their systems has often proved more than happy to trash that system if the victim isn’t sufficiently compliant.
Help with the problem you didn’t know you had
Support scams are by no means new: I first started writing about them in 2010 or thereabouts, as did Josep. In those days, the problem was mostly confined to cold calls (unsolicited telephone calls) made to more-or-less random English-speaking computer users. In due course, these calls got to be supported by a dubious infrastructure of websites and Facebook pages offering ‘help’ to users of specific products. These gave the scammers the ability to point to sites marketing their apparently ‘legitimate’ services when cold-calling reluctant victims. However, they were also widely advertised through search engines so that potential victims with a genuine computer problem were likely to come across these less-than-genuine services and phone numbers when searching for a source of assistance.
Irritatingly, we have seen many instances of such sites offering ‘support’ for specific legitimate products where the vendor already offered real support via their own pages. Though we have also seen isolated instances where a vendor outsourced support to companies who misused their position of trust to press their own advantage using classic support scam techniques.
Cold-calling to SEO to fake alerts
In recent years, cold-calling and basic SEO (Search Engine Optimization) exploitation has to a large extent been augmented or supplanted by the use of various highly proactive methods – including what amounts to malware – of luring the victim into actively ringing the ‘support line’.
Consider, for instance, a malicious program that masquerades as an installer for Microsoft’s own Security Essentials program. Hicurdismos generated a fake Blue Screen of Death (BSoD) including a ‘helpline number’: so it was essentially a malware-aided tech support scam, spread by drive-by-download, and taking steps – such as hiding the mouse cursor and disabling Task Manager – to make its payload look like a serious system issue.
However, most attacks take the form of fake system alerts that ‘warn’ the victim of a virus or similarly frightening issue and provide a ‘support’ telephone number. (Sometimes these use a similar fake system crash to those used by some bottom-feeder ransomware gangs.)
When a victim is frightened into ringing one of these numbers, he or she is connected to a scammer who uses similar techniques to the cold-call scammers of yore to trick the victim into thinking that they have a real problem, and that the scammer can really fix it. Though once the scammer has direct contact with victims, the tricks they use against Windows users are much the same deceptive gambits as those used for years:
·         To ‘prove’ that the scammer has information specific to the victim’s system (e.g. the CLSID gambit)
·         And to ‘prove’ that there is a real problem (as proven by misrepresenting the output of standard Windows utilities).
Telemetry and statistics
There is a disadvantage to this trend, however, as far as the scammer is concerned. It’s obviously easier for security companies to track scam URLs that pop up deceptive messages than it is to track random phone calls. I don’t track our telemetry regularly at this point in my career, but Josep has noted that in recent months, we have seen a considerable increase in the number of Spanish users who have received a call or seen an alert on their system urging them to call a ‘support’ phone number. He continues:
If we look at the evolution of this threat we see that until July 2016 it was hardly ever reported in Spain. However, from that date, the number of detections has grown continuously, and this type of attack at times now accounts for almost 50% of threats detected in Spain according to ESET’s monthly monitoring system Virus Radar.
Continued on